Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Humiliating
Rush may be right about Obama being a thug; but what does it say about us as a nation that we should permit ourselves to be imposed upon by such a candy-assed thug? This narcissistic, petulant, ignorant, intellectual nothing-burger of a glorified ward heeler. Who wears mom jeans and munches on arugula. T.S. Eliot really demonstrated a knowledge of his onions when he wrote, “This is the way the world ends/Not with a bang but a whimper.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Obama is indeed a candy ass. But he has genuine thugs willing to do the down-and-dirty thuggery for him: SEIU, Teamsters, National Black Panthers Party, National Education Association, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson..........
Not to mention MO. She'll do you up a treat with a garden trowel, mate!
I wouldn't say he's ignorant.
Yeah, maybe I would.
Pres. Obama is rightly incensed that the Supreme Court justices are “an unintellected group of people” whereby he means, I take it, that they’re unelected (and also, perhaps, nowhere near as well-read on the nuances of constitutional law as he). My question, though, as an Australian who’s obviously missed hearing of a few elections here and there, is: who exactly voted for Timothy Geithner, Leon Panetta and Eric Holder?
Who indeed, Deadman? And who voted for that army of "czars" he appointed on the sly?
Deadman,
Obama voted for them. Here in the USSA we have a principle of one man, one vote.* Obama is the man and he has the vote.
*Except in Chicago, where the rule is "vote early and vote often".
Post a Comment